We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GC Medical Science corp.

Download Mobile App




Evaluating 100-Year-Old Equipment Shows Evolution of X-ray Technology

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 30 Mar 2011
Researchers recently assessed first-generation X-ray equipment from 1896 and discovered that it generated radiation doses and exposure times that were enormously higher than those of today's systems.

The report was published online in March 2011 and in the May 2011 print edition of the journal Radiology. "To my knowledge, nobody had ever done systematic measurements on this equipment, since by the time one had the tools, these systems had been replaced by more sophisticated ones,” said the study's lead author, Gerrit J. More...
Kemerink, PhD, from Maastricht University Medical Center (The Netherlands).

Wilhelm Roentgen reported his discovery of X-rays on December 28, 1895. A few weeks later, Dr. H.J. Hoffmans, a physicist and high school director in Maastricht, the Netherlands, and L. Th. van Kleef, MD, director of a local hospital, performed anatomic imaging experiments with an X-ray system built from equipment at Dr. Hoffmans' high school. Major components of the system included a high-voltage transformer and a glass bulb with metal electrodes at each end.

Technology advanced rapidly, and the setup used by Dr. Hoffmans and Dr. van Kleef soon became obsolete. Ultimately, the equipment ended up abandoned in a Maastricht warehouse. A year ago, Jos M.A. van Engelshoven, MD, PhD, former radiology head at the Maastricht University Medical Center, retrieved the equipment, most of which was still in working order, for a television program on the history of health care in the region. Dr. Kemerink then decided to study the arrangement in more detail.

The Maastricht researchers repeated some of the first imaging exams, using the equipment to image a hand specimen from a body that had been donated to science. "We sometimes worked in a fully dark room that had black walls, with the only light coming from the flashing tube and from discharges in the spark gap,” Dr. Kemerink said. "Together with the irregular buzz of the interrupter and the crackling sound of the discharges, this created a very special, kind of ghostly, ambiance.”

The researchers compared the radiation dose, X-ray beam properties and electrical characteristics of the 1896 system with those from a modern X-ray system. Using the same exposure conditions used in 1896, the estimated skin dose needed to image the hand was nearly 1,500 times greater on the first-generation system than on the modern system—74 mGy and 0.05 mGy, respectively. Corresponding exposure times were 90 minutes for the old system and 21 milliseconds for the modern system.

Pinhole images revealed that the X-rays originated from an extended area of the glass wall in the system's construction, causing image blurring. Nevertheless, the 114-year-old system produced what Dr. Kemerink described as surprisingly good images in which anatomic features were clearly visible.

The high radiation doses and long exposures times of early X-ray equipment caused significant health problems for the technology's innovators. Adverse effects, such as eye complaints, skin burns, and loss of hair, were reported within weeks of Roentgen's discovery. "Many operators of the early X-ray systems experienced severe damage to hands over time, often necessitating amputations or other surgery,” Dr. Kemerink said.

X-ray technology improved quickly in the 20th century, with considerably lower radiation dose and exposure time and improved image quality, making it an efficient and safe imaging modality and an invaluable diagnostic tool.

Related Links:

Maastricht University Medical Center



Platinum Member
Real-Time Diagnostics Onscreen Viewer
GEMweb Live
Gold Member
Temperature Monitor
ThermoScan Temperature Monitoring Unit
Morcellator
TCM 3000 BL
OR Table Accessory
Angular Accessory Rail
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: Professor Bumsoo Han and postdoctoral researcher Sae Rome Choi of Illinois co-authored a study on using DNA origami to enhance imaging of dense pancreatic tissue (Photo courtesy of Fred Zwicky/University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign)

DNA Origami Improves Imaging of Dense Pancreatic Tissue for Cancer Detection and Treatment

One of the challenges of fighting pancreatic cancer is finding ways to penetrate the organ’s dense tissue to define the margins between malignant and normal tissue. Now, a new study uses DNA origami structures... Read more

Patient Care

view channel
Image: The portable biosensor platform uses printed electrochemical sensors for the rapid, selective detection of Staphylococcus aureus (Photo courtesy of AIMPLAS)

Portable Biosensor Platform to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Infections

Approximately 4 million patients in the European Union acquire healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) or nosocomial infections each year, with around 37,000 deaths directly resulting from these infections,... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.