Standardized Analysis Recommended for SPECT Cardiac Imaging

The study, which involved images done on 328 heart patients at Sacred Heart, is part of an effort to standardize cardiac-image analyses to improve both diagnostics and patient care.

A lack of important consistency is evident from analyses now conducted with three widely used software packages, according to Dr. Mathews Fish, medical director of nuclear cardiology at the Oregon Heart & Vascular Institute at Sacred Heart. Inconsistencies can occur, for example, he reported, when comparing images done on over time or when results on a patient come from different labs.

Dr. Fish is part of a collaborative research project with Cedars-Sinai that includes a recently awarded grant from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH; Bethesda, MD, USA) for the development of an automated high-performance system for analyzing three-dimensional (3D) cardiac singe-photon emission tomography (SPECT) imaging. SPECT uses gamma rays to create pictures of organs and their structures.

The recently published study is believed to be the first head-to-head comparison of the commercially available software used in such cardiac-related diagnostics. Cardiac SPECT is performed in conjunction with stress testing to compare blood flow to the heart muscle when patients are at rest or stressed. The images are analyzed using computer software. The new study found significant differences in diagnostic performance and quantification of abnormalities in the sophisticated software packages being used for cardiac SPECT imaging.

Because of its high diagnostic accuracy in determining the presence of significant coronary artery disease and its ability to determine the risk of a heart attack, cardiac SPECT imaging has become a useful tool in the care of patients with suspected heart disease. Important management and treatment decisions are based not only on whether the test is abnormal, but also on the level of the abnormality, which is best determined by computer software.

The database used in the study to compare the various results was created and maintained by Santiago Lorenzo, a doctoral student in the University of Oregon's department of human physiology. Dr. Lorenzo adapted the results into Microsoft Access. "It was very useful to use since I had to constantly analyze the data in many different ways,” he said. "Having the data organized made my job much easier.” Dr. Lorenzo's participation in the study was done as part of collaboration between the hospital and the UO's human physiology department.

"This study shows the tangible benefits of the Oregon Heart & Vascular Institute's research partnership with the University of Oregon,” Dr. Fish said. "Such research performed locally in our own institutions greatly enhances the quality of medical outcomes and supports the use of the most appropriate and effective technology for the care of patients.”


Related Links:
Sacred Heart Medical Center
University of Oregon
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center