We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
GC Medical Science corp.

Download Mobile App




Neonatal Breathing Reveals Circumcision Pain Is Not Severe

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 20 Jun 2013
A new study suggests that infants circumcised without anesthesia do not experience more pain or a greater likelihood of sleep disturbances than boys who were not circumcised.

Researchers at West Virginia University (Morgantown, USA) conducted a retrospective study from 1994 to 1999 that analyzed respiration rates among 17 babies before and after circumcision, and compared those results to 4 uncircumcised boys and 23 girls. More...
The researchers used the Quiet Sleep Respiratory Rate (QSRR) scale as a marker of pain, since the expectation is that pain by circumcision would affect sleep in newborns.

The results showed that an increase in breaths-per-minute on the QSRR scale was observed across all of the babies in the sample, including a significant increase in the uncircumcised boys, but the differences between the two groups was not significant. The researchers also looked at differences in QSRR based on whether children were bottle-fed or breast-fed, but again no discernible difference was observed. The study was presented as a poster session at the annual meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies (APSS), held during June 2013 in Baltimore (MD, USA).

“Of course, we can't ask children if they feel any pain. There is no real measure of pain for these infants,” said lead author and study presenter PhD student Margeaux Schade, BSc. “The idea is if they have elevated cortisol because of chronic pain exposure then theoretically they will exhibit increases in stable respiratory rate. There was an increase between groups, but there was no significant difference between groups.”

Male circumcision remains the subject of controversy on a number of grounds, including religious, ethical, sexual, and health. The Ancient Greeks and Romans valued the foreskin and were opposed to circumcision—an opposition inherited by the canon and secular legal systems of the Christian West that lasted at least through to the Middle Ages. Traditional Judaism and Islam have advocated male circumcision as a religious obligation.

Although previous claims of benefits like curing masturbation, gout, epilepsy, and even insanity were no doubt absurd, important research has shed light on real medical benefits of circumcision. In particular, the procedure has consistently shown to result in the decreased risk of debilitating and costly diseases such as HIV, cervical cancer, and infantile urinary tract infection. Because of advances in the understanding of the anatomy of the foreskin and pain conditioning in infants, prevailing attitudes about anesthesia and analgesia during the procedure remain in controversy.

Related Links:

West Virginia University



Platinum Member
Real-Time Diagnostics Onscreen Viewer
GEMweb Live
Gold Member
Heavy-Duty Wheelchair Scale
6495 Stationary
PACS Workstation
PaxeraView PRO
Medical Monitor
SILENIO D
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Patient Care

view channel
Image: The portable biosensor platform uses printed electrochemical sensors for the rapid, selective detection of Staphylococcus aureus (Photo courtesy of AIMPLAS)

Portable Biosensor Platform to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Infections

Approximately 4 million patients in the European Union acquire healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) or nosocomial infections each year, with around 37,000 deaths directly resulting from these infections,... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.